Get on the path to results today.
NEW DELHI | MUMBAI: Christmas celebrations broke out early at the Patiala House complex in Delhi on Thursday morning. The 2G case that had taken seven years and involved charge sheets that ran into 10,000 pages, besides testimony from more than 150 people, came to a sudden end at about 10:40 am as judge OP Saini acquitted all the accused — former telecom minister A Raja, DMK lawmaker Kanimozhi and 15 others.
Raja hugged his lawyer, Kanimozhi was jubilant. The Essar Group’s Ravi Ruia and Anshuman Ruia, Reliance ADAG vice president Surendra Pipara and DB Realty promoter Vinod Goenka broke down and embraced each another. Lawyers representing the 18 accused rushed out of the court to spread the message that their clients had been acquitted.
Just minutes before the judgement, one of Raja’s lawyers Babanjeet Singh had said: “We hope to win today, we have been working for this all through the year for seven years.” As Saini read his second judgement — there were three cases in all that he decided on Thursday — DMK supporters who had thronged Patiala House burst crackers and distributed sweets.
New Delhi : Jailed former communications minister Andimuthu Raja is not very keen on getting out on bail because he would prefer to walk out of prison with “clean hands” in the 2G spectrum allotment controversy that has dominated national attention for over a year.
In an exclusive interview to IANS, Raja maintained his “innocence” and said he was concentrating on cross-examining the prosecution witnesses, but didn’t elaborate on the case which is pending before a special court of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
“I want to come out of jail with clean hands, rather than be released on bail,” Raja told IANS in a Patiala House court during the hearing of the case Friday.
Raja has completed more than 14 months in Delhi’s Tihar Jail in the case that cost the DMK leader his ministerial job in November 2010.
The trial has been dragging on for more than a year now with some 410 applications, including bail pleas from other accused, filed. But not a single application has been moved by the DMK MP seeking bail or to attend parliament sessions.
Raja was arrested Feb 2, 2011 by the CBI for his alleged involvement in the 2G spectrum allocation scam, which is purported to have caused a huge loss to the national exchequer.
He was sent to Tihar on Feb 17 last year.
Raja told IANS he was looking forward to conclude the trial “as early as possible”.
“It will be better to seek acquittal…trying to complete trial as early as possible. However, I could move my bail application (if the trial drags on), wait for that time,” he said.
Raja’s nephew T. Srinivisan, who is not counselling him but assisting him in preparing his case, said the former communications minister is waiting for the bail application of former telecom secretary Sidharth Behura, who is also in Tihar Jail.
Except for Raja and Behura, all the arrested accused have been released on bail. Behura’s bail is pending in the Supreme Court.
Raja’s counsel Babanjeet Singh said: “If Behura’s bail is accepted in the top court, then we will approach the court for Raja’s bail also.”
Another of his counsels said Raja’s legal team was waiting to conclude the cross examination of D.S. Mathur, another former telecom secretary who had deposed against the DMK leader.
“Then we will think about other matters – whether to move bail or to go parliament,” the counsel said, requesting not to be named.
The special CBI court had remarked that Raja could attend parliament if he wanted to. But the MP replied that his first priority was to present his case before a judicial bench instead.
Another co-accused and DMK MP, Kanimozhi had been granted permission to attend parliament.
According to the government auditor, the 2G scam allegedly masterminded by Raja pertained to biased distribution of mobile airwaves and operating licences, in lieu of kickbacks, to telecom firms that could have cost the treasury up to Rs.1.76 lakh crore in lost revenue.
Nineteen individuals and six companies are accused in the case.
“Within upper middle-class people, there is usually more property to go around than lower middle class or poor folks, so there is more chance of a compromise happening,” he says. “Everyone’s greed can be satisfied somehow, so they don’t need to come to court as much.”
Increased abus
HelpAge India’s studies show a marked increase in the percentage of elders who report abuse – from 23 per cent in 2013 to 50 per cent in 2014.
The NGO found that “economic dependence of the abuser on the victim” was a motivation for abuse: the elderly are browbeaten because their kids need their money or property. Even the youth have noticed: over 76 per cent said they had witnessed abuse of the elderly in their own homes, according to HelpAge.
The study also found that there was more abuse in lower middle-class and middle-class families. Lack of resources leads to more infighting, says advocate Babanjeet Singh.
Copyright © 2023 Defence Lawyers - All Rights Reserved.
Defence Lawyers is a full-service law firm providing legal services in India. Our attorneys are registered with the Bar Council of India and are licensed to practice law in all courts in India. We are committed to providing high-quality legal services to our clients and maintaining the highest ethical standards. Our website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us to schedule a consultation to discuss your specific legal needs." Regenerate response
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise.By clicking the 'Agree' button and accessing this website (www.defencelawyers.in) the user fully accepts that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the Firm or its members.The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for information purposes only. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.The firm is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.